A remarkable entry from Merriam Webster’s dictionary (which I found linked from the Wikipedia article):
sex·ism noun \ˈsek-ˌsi-zəm\
1 : prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially : discrimination against women
2 : behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex
The first definition has been in use for a long time, and is (I would suggest) widely recognized. But note the second one. According to Merriam Webster, any expressed positive view whatsoever, however limited, of any historically-recognised (a.k.a. ‘stereotypical’) gender-based social roles is, by definition, sexist.
Have I understood that correctly?
Spotted while browsing Pyongyang on OpenStreetMap:
Most party schools don’t go so far as to put it in their names…
My time machine is nearly here! Or is it here already?
Nokia Plan B led me to “In memoriam: Microsoft’s previous strategic mobile partners“. This got me thinking: can anyone name a company which fits the following criteria?
- Announced a major partnership with Microsoft
- Took all or most of the actions or joint actions specified in the initial press release
- Produced benefits to long-term shareholders as a result
Or to put it another way: can anyone name a Microsoft partnership which turned out to be a good thing for the company concerned? (This is not a rhetorical question; I am not implying there have never been any.)
“Partnership” means working together on products, not just reselling Windows.
At FOSDEM, I was given a copy of “Confessions of a Public Speaker” by Scott Berkun (thanks, Josette!).
It’s an story-filled ramble through the life of someone who talks for a living. It was an entertaining read, although it could perhaps have done with more summarizing of the material, as when I reached the end I realised that I would have to re-read it if I wanted to make a list of things to change about my own speaking style and habits. But I was very pleased to see him call the Logitech Cordless Presenter, which I own, “the Cadillac of remote controls”. The man has good taste.
Oh, and there’s a story from me in the “You can’t do worse than this” section :-)
 OK, OK. On gandalf’s recommendation.
I visited a site linked from Slashdot today, which was an article (press release) about a new “open” mobile phone. The thing that amazed me was the small percentage of the initially-visible browser window devoted to actual useful content. 9.08%, by my calculations. And I have a 1280×1024 screen.
So I hereby inaugurate the 2010 “Content? What’s That?” Awards. Find a website page with as small a percentage of the page devoted to content as possible, post a screenshot on your blog with the content highlighted in red, as above, and the percentage calculated, and link to it here. Lowest percentage wins.
- Sites must be family-friendly.
- Page must actually have some content – those typo-squatted all-ads domains don’t count.
- Analysis is made on the first visible page section only. Yes, people have different display sizes. In case of dispute, I’ll make a final judgement on my display.
- Please post screenshots stripped of browser chrome. You may also want to shrink them 50%.
- Headlines count as content. Metadata, intra-site links and ads do not.
- Whitespace does not count as content. Exception: whitespace within content, e.g. paragraph breaks and space were a headline would go if it were longer, do count.
- Yes, almost no website would ever score 100%.That’s OK.
Let’s see if this works :-)
The most under-appreciated skill in the modern world is someone who can explain the complex in simple terms without trivializing it.
— Scott Berkun
Anyone want to suggest other contenders for the title?
From a Google search inspired by an idea I got reading Scott Berkun’s Why panel sessions suck (and how to fix them):
Why has no-one commercialized this? It’s the obvious solution to the “pass the microphone” problem at panels, talks and other audience-participation events.
When Google launched their Map Maker community mapping tool last year, they included loads of Caribbean islands. This led Ed Parsons (chief Google Maps guy) to make a comment at State of the Map (the OSM conference) in Limerick that he was sad there wasn’t any fieldwork involved.
This off-the-cuff suggestion, and a spirit of friendly competition, caused me to set up a pledge on the PledgeBank website. People pledged to improve OpenStreetMap’s coverage in the Caribbean themselves by tracing over available aerial imagery, and to donate £10 each towards sending one lucky mapper on just such a field trip.
74 people, including Ed Parsons himself, signed the pledge, raising £740 to fund the expedition. One name from the pledgelist was chosen by a verifiable random process – Steve Chilton from Middlesex University, UK, who happens to be a professional cartographer. So he gets to go to Antigua and add road names and points of interest to the map :-)
As a great man once said, “I love it when a plan comes together” :-)
Via an old post on BoingBoing, I just came across the AirPower wiki, which lists the locations of power outlets in airports. Very handy. However, the wiki software used doesn’t require logins, so it has been vandalised hundreds of times over the past few years.
I’ve restored one of the last known good versions, but I don’t expect it to last. Does anyone know anywhere appropriate that this information could live where it would be protected, loved, cherished and maintained?
No, Facebook, I do not speak “English (UK)”. I speak English, the language of England (the clue is in the name). Please add the awkward qualifying verbal appendages to the description of your own, derivative dialect. :-P
I may be the last to notice this, but: Twitter – the web command line?
However, I can’t try these things out because I’ve forgotten my twitter password. I ask for a password reset email but one never arrives. I’ve been trying for the past six weeks, so it’s not just Twitter flakiness. My help ticket has gone unanswered.
I know I definitely have an account and I know I’m using the right email address.
Anyone any ideas? What do I do?
Congratulations to Planet Earth, which has pulled back from being 20-13 behind at the start of the decade to tie the Earth vs. Mars Expensive Hardware Lob (EHL). See the NASA site for future play dates.
Imagine for a moment what a Martian student would think if he took a trip to earth to research an essay on ‘Men – what are they and what makes them tick?‘ What do we look like from the outside? What conclusions might be reach about us as a whole?
He might drop in to a local newsagent before doing some observational field research to look at some of the things men are interested in reading about. A quick trawl through the shelves for men reveals a complex variety of subjects. Men, it would seem, are interested in sex, cars, sex, computers, sex, body building, more sex and clothes… and did I mention sex?
But dig a little deeper, and the magazines would tell him that the only reason that men are interested in cars, body building and clothes is so that they can have more… you guessed it… sex!
I’m not quite sure where computers fit in.
— Tim Thornborough, in chapter 2 of Man to Man… about God.